Small-scale movements and site fidelity of two sympatric sea turtle species at a remote atoll
-
Published:2024-03-08
Issue:4
Volume:171
Page:
-
ISSN:0025-3162
-
Container-title:Marine Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Mar Biol
Author:
Sanchez Cheryl L.ORCID, Bunbury Nancy, Mortimer Jeanne A., A’Bear Luke, Appoo Jennifer, Betts Michael, von Brandis Rainer, Cook Lorraine, van de Crommenacker Janske, Currie Jock C., Doak Naomi, Fleischer-Dogley Frauke, Mahoune Terrence, Mederic Emma, Mels Bruno, Pistorius Pierre, Richards Heather, Samedi Uzice, Casale Paolo
Abstract
AbstractUnderstanding natural movement patterns and ecological roles of marine megafauna is a research priority best studied in areas with minimal human impact. The spatial distribution patterns specifically for immature turtles at foraging grounds have been highlighted as a research gap for effective management and conservation strategies for sea turtle populations. Capture–mark–recapture (CMR) records (n = 2287) of 1672 immature green (Chelonia mydas) (n = 1158) and hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) (n = 514) from a long-term (1981–2021) in-water CMR program at Aldabra Atoll, Seychelles, were analyzed for 10 sites (0.35–25 km apart). Site fidelity was not correlated with either season or turtle size. Green turtles had lower site fidelity than hawksbill turtles. Green turtles showed avoidance (i.e., opposite of fidelity) of three sites, while hawksbill turtles displayed high fidelity to two sites. Sites displaying non-random behavior (avoidance and/or fidelity) did not share the same benthic habitat types. Results indicate that fidelity can be detected at a fine scale with CMR, but that further exploration into the habitat characteristics of the sites and the ecological roles of both species at the atoll is needed.
Funder
Università di Pisa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference103 articles.
1. Allen Z, Shah N, Grant A, Derand G, Bell D (2010) Hawksbill turtle monitoring in Cousin Island Special Reserve, Seychelles: an eight-fold increase in annual nesting numbers. Endanger Species Res 11:195–200. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00281 2. André J, Gyuris E, Lawler IR (2005) Comparison of the diets of sympatric dugongs and green turtles on the Orman Reefs, Torres Strait, Australia. Wildl Res 32:53. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04015 3. Appoo J, Sanchez C, Burt AJ, Richards H, van de Crommenacker J, Currie J, Fleischer-Dogley F (2019) The use of Aldabra and its protected waters by marine mammals. Seychelles Res J 1:166–179 4. Atwood TB, Connolly RM, Ritchie EG, Lovelock CE, Heithaus MR, Hays GC, Fourqurean JW, Macreadie PI (2015) Predators help protect carbon stocks in blue carbon ecosystems. Nat Clim Chang 5:1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2763 5. Balazs GH (1999) Factors to consider in the tagging of sea turtles. In: Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois A, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group, Washington, pp 101–109
|
|