Author:
Hummel M.,Müller A.,Forthuber S.,Kranzl L.,Mayr B.,Haas R.
Abstract
AbstractMitigating CO2 emissions for space heating (SH) and hot water (HW) preparation in buildings is key to reaching climate protection targets. In this context, it is important to understand meaningful balances between CO2 reduction through thermal renovation activities and the change of heating systems. In this work, we develop cost-optimal balances for different system settings with the Invert/Opt model. This model optimises the measures applied in each building so that the system costs for SH and HW preparation are minimised under given constraints for a given country. About 500–1000 options are considered for each building. We calculate scenarios and sensitivities for all countries of EU-27, reflecting a 95% reduction in CO2 emissions for SH and HW with a mix of direct and indirect RES technologies. These differ in the settings related to the applicability and costs of building-shell-related measures and the costs and availability of resource potentials. The results show that probably a high share of thermal renovation on total upcoming refurbishment activities until 2050 is cost-efficient to reach a 95% CO2 reduction in the EU-27 building stocks. Assuming that up to 90% of the buildings in each EU-27 country is applicable for a thermal renovation in case a refurbishment activity is needed leads to around 4% lower system costs by 2050 (13 billion EUR/year) compared to assuming a maximum share of 35%. Energy needs are reduced on average more in older buildings than in newer buildings. Nonetheless, a combination of thermal renovation and heating system change is often the most cost-effective option to reduce system-wide CO2 emissions also in more recent buildings. The calculations lead to cost-optimal savings in final energy demand in the range of 29–47% between 2019 and 2050. Assuming less favourable conditions for thermal renovation (high capital recovery expectations, additional technical barriers and high availability of cheap fuels) the cost-optimal level of heat savings in buildings for overall EU-27 could be suspected at around 1/3 down to 1/4 of current final energy demand.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
TU Wien
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Ben Amer-Allam, S., Münster, M., & Petrović, S. (2017). Scenarios for sustainable heat supply and heat savings in municipalities - The case of Helsingør, Denmark. Energy, 137, 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.091
2. Boermans, T., Grözinger, J., von Manteuffel, B., Surmeli-Anac, N., John, A., Leutgöb, K., & Bachner, D. (2015). Assessment of cost optimal calculations in the context of the EPBD (ENER/C3/2013-414) (Final Report). Ecofys for European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/default/files/documents/Assessment%20of%20cost%20optimal%20calculations%20in%20the%20context%20of%20the%20EPBD_Final.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2022.
3. Büchele, R., Kranzl, L., & Hummel, M. (2019). Integrated strategic heating and cooling planning on regional level for the case of Brasov. Energy, 171, 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.030
4. Carpino, C., Bruno, R., & Arcuri, N. (2020). Social housing refurbishment for the improvement of city sustainability: Identification of targeted interventions based on a disaggregated cost-optimal approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102223
5. CEN. (2008). EN ISO 13790:2008. Energy performance of buildings – Calculation of energy use for heating and cooling. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.