How the meanings of ‘home’ influence energy-consuming practices in domestic buildings

Author:

Wang XinfangORCID,Ghanem Dana Abi,Larkin Alice,McLachlan Carly

Abstract

AbstractThe UK introduced carbon budgets in 2008, with an aim to reduce greenhouse gases by 80% by 2050 compared with the 1990 levels. It has been argued that the 2015 Paris Agreement on limiting the global average temperature rise to ‘well below 2° C’ requires deeper and more rapid emission reductions than the current UK targets. Household energy consumption accounts for almost a third of total UK CO2 emissions in recent years. This paper explores drivers of high energy consumption in domestic buildings from a sociological practice perspective and through a lens of dominant meanings of ‘home’. Whilst the practice approach and meanings of home have been explored separately in the literature to understand household energy consumption, this paper adds new findings on the interaction between the meanings of home and the elements of practices. Results show the dominant meaning of home differs between householders; this in turn affects the materials and procedures of energy-consuming practices. For instance, if ‘home’ means ‘hospitality’, this changes the standard of comfort and convenience people perceive at home. Understanding how practices and meanings of the home intersect, provides new, much needed insights that could support policy change commensurate with more rapidly reducing CO2 emissions from domestic energy consumption.

Funder

University of Manchester

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Energy

Reference86 articles.

1. Agbemabiese, L., Berko, Jr K. and du Pont, P. (1996). Air conditioning in the tropics: cool comfort or cultural conditioning? Paper presented at the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Human Dimensions of Energy Consumption, Washington, D.C.

2. Anderson, K. (2015). Duality in climate science. Nature Geoscience, 8, 898–900.

3. Anderson, K., & Bows, A. (2011). Beyond dangerous climate change: emission pathways for a new world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 20–44.

4. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405.

5. Aune, M. (2002). Users versus utilities — the domestication of an energy controlling technology. In A. Jamison & H. Rohracher (Eds.), Technology Studies & Sustainable Development. Profil Verlag: Munich.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3