Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient memory for psychological treatment contents is a promising transdiagnostic mechanism of change, but there is little consensus concerning its measurement. We conducted a pilot psychometric investigation of the Conceptualization Task, a novel measure of patient memory for treatment.
Methods
Data were from a trial comparing cognitive therapy-as-usual to cognitive therapy plus the Memory Support Intervention (MSI) for adults with depression (N = 171). For the Conceptualization Task, patients read clinical vignettes and provided written responses to assess three facets of conceptualization: identifying contributing factors to psychopathology, making intervention recommendations, and providing a rationale for recommendations. Higher scores were given to responses reflecting accurate memory for the theoretical model and change strategies used in treatment.
Results
The Conceptualization Task showed excellent inter-rater reliability and sensitivity to change during treatment, but only fair test–retest reliability and insufficient internal consistency. Findings supported discriminant validity with measures of education, IQ, and general memory functioning, but not convergent validity with existing measures of patient memory for treatment. Criterion validity analyses showed that some aspects of the Conceptualization Task were associated with therapist use of memory support strategies from the MSI and treatment outcome. However, findings were mixed, effect sizes were small, and some results did not remain statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.
Conclusions
Further refinement and testing is needed before the Conceptualization Task may be used to assess the patient memory for treatment contents.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Clinical Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference61 articles.
1. Abma, I. L., Rovers, M., & Van Der Wees, P. J. (2016). Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2034-2
2. Andersson, G., Carlbring, P., & Furmark, T. (2012). Therapist experience and knowledge acquisition in internet-delivered CBT for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037411
3. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Press.
4. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57(1), 289–300.
5. Berg, M., Rozental, A., Johansson, S., Liljethörn, L., Radvogin, E., Topooco, N., & Andersson, G. (2019). The role of knowledge in internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescent depression: Results from a randomised controlled study. Internet Interventions, 15, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2018.10.001