A Vicious Cycle? Group-Level Analysis of Intra-Individual Dynamics in Mental Health Variables
-
Published:2024-07-25
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0147-5916
-
Container-title:Cognitive Therapy and Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cogn Ther Res
Author:
Bommer JanaORCID, Schwartz Brian, Klein Christine, Rupp Jan, Katalinic Alexander, Assmann Nele, Borsche Max, Balck Alexander, Föh Bandik, Lutz Wolfgang, Klein Jan P.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The network theory of mental disorders asserts the pivotal role of feedback loops in psychopathology. We investigated intra-individual dynamics and potential feedback loops in psychological networks and their association with long-term outcomes.
Methods
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, data from a population-based cohort (N = 2029) were collected every three days for six months on well-being, worries, fatigue, sleep quality, social integration, and activity. Subgrouping—Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation -was used to estimate networks of time-series data on the individual, subgroup, and group levels. Subgroup networks were compared and associations of subgroup membership with sociodemographic and health status variables at baseline and outcomes at follow-up were examined.
Results
Despite the large heterogeneity between individuals, a potential feedback loop involving sleep quality, fatigue and well-being was identified. Furthermore, two subgroups were identified, whereby the edges of the potential feedback loop were more present in Subgroup 1 than in Subgroup 2. Membership to Subgroup 1 was associated with lower education and fewer people aged over 60 in their household at baseline as well as poorer well-being, more worries, and more frequent and earlier COVID-19 diagnoses at follow-up.
Conclusions
The identified feedback loop might indeed represent a vicious cycle and thus contribute to the development of psychopathology. However, limitations such as the limited measurement density made it difficult to find temporal associations and call for a cautious interpretation of results.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Universität Trier
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Ammar, A., Trabelsi, K., Brach, M., Chtourou, H., Boukhris, O., Masmoudi, L., Bouaziz, B., Bentlage, E., How, D., Ahmed, M., Mueller, P., Mueller, N., Hammouda, O., Paineiras-Domingos, L., Braakman-jansen, A., Wrede, C., Bastoni, S., Pernambuco, C., Mataruna, L., & Hoekelmann, A. (2021). Effects of home confinement on mental health and lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak: Insight from the ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study. Biology of Sport, 38(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.96857 2. Araya, R., Lewis, G., Rojas, G., & Fritsch, R. (2003). Education and income: Which is more important for mental health? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(7), 501–505. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.7.501 3. Armstrong, D., & Dregan, A. (2014). A population-based investigation into the self-reported reasons for sleep problems. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e101368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101368 4. Asmundson, G. J. G., Abramowitz, J. S., Richter, A. A., & Whedon, M. (2010). Health anxiety: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. Current Psychiatry Reports, 12(4), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-010-0123-9 5. Balck, A., Föh, B., Borsche, M., Rahmöller, J., Vollstedt, E.-J., Waldeck, F., Käding, N., Twesten, C., Mischnik, A., Gillessen-Kaesbach, G., Ehlers, M., Sina, C., Taube, S., Busch, H., Rupp, J., Katalinic, A., & Klein, C. (2022). Protocol of the Luebeck longitudinal investigation of SARS-CoV-2 infection (ELISA) study – a prospective population-based cohort study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1305. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13666-z
|
|