Abstract
Abstract
Background
A revised looming vulnerability model is described that updates the original conceptual model and synthesizes new findings and evidence. The revised model extends the notion of dynamic threat by describing the role of cognitive-perceptual distortions. Moreover, it suggests that dynamic threat perceptions, particularly that threats are approaching, serve as warning signals that lower the threshold for appraising threat, influencing negative emotional responses (primarily but not only anxiety and fear), cognitive-affective processing, behavior, and maladaptive coping. Individual differences in “looming cognitive style” can lead to transdiagnostic vulnerability to anxiety (and less so, to depression), maladaptive defensive reactions, cognitive-affective (experiential) avoidance, and stress generation.
Methods
This article reviews the conceptualization proposed by the revised looming vulnerability model, and comprehensively reviews its scientific foundation, and current supporting evidence that has accrued for the model across diverse research domains.
Results
The revised conceptualization of the looming vulnerability model is amply supported by the accumulated research, which highlights the importance of dynamic stimuli for attention, memory, emotional, and neurological response. Likewise, the looming cognitive style is supported by a substantial number of studies, linking it to cognitive vulnerability to anxiety, biased threat processing, maladaptive coping and cognitive-affective avoidance, and developmental antecedents.
Conclusions
The review of evidence supports the revised looming vulnerability model's tenets about the importance of dynamic stimulusi features, which previous models have neglected, and of the looming cognitive style, which is proposed as a distinct cognitive vulnerability Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference199 articles.
1. Adler, A. D., & Strunk, D. R. (2010). Looming maladaptive style as a moderator of risk factors for anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-008-9221
2. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Raniere, D., & Dyller, I. (1999). Research methods in adult psychopathology. In P. C. Kendall, J. N. Butcher, & G. N. Holmbeck (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (2nd ed.). Wiley.
3. Altan-Atalay, A. (2018a). Looming cognitive style (LCS), repetitive negative thinking (RNT), and anxiety: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 11, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-018-0021-1
4. Altan-Atalay, A. (2018b). Interactive effects of looming cognitive style and maladaptive perfectionism on trait anxiety. Journal of Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, 36, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0289-3
5. Altan-Atalay, A. (2018c). Moderator role of looming cognitive style (LCS) in the relationship between attentional control and anxiety: Difference between shifting and focusing dimensions. The Journal of Psychology, 152(7), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1466775