Effects of Training Body-Related Interpretations on Panic-Related Cognitions and Symptoms
-
Published:2023-02-09
Issue:3
Volume:47
Page:494-509
-
ISSN:0147-5916
-
Container-title:Cognitive Therapy and Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cogn Ther Res
Author:
Würtz FelixORCID, Steinman ShariORCID, Blackwell Simon E.ORCID, Wilhelm Frank H., Reinecke AndreaORCID, Adolph Dirk, Margraf JürgenORCID, Woud Marcella L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Interpretation biases (IBs) are central in panic disorder, and there is rich evidence showing that these are correlated with and predictive of panic-relevant symptomatology. However, experimental studies are needed to examine the potential causal effects of IBs, as predicted by cognitive models.
Methods
Panic-related IBs were manipulated via a sentence-completion Cognitive Bias Modification-Interpretation (CBM-I) training. The sample included N = 112 healthy participants reporting moderate levels of fear of bodily sensations. Participants were randomly allocated to a positive, negative, or control CBM-I condition. To test the trainings’ effect on panic-relevant cognitive processing, IBs were assessed via proximal and distal measures. Symptom provocation tasks were applied to test transfer to panic-relevant symptomatology.
Results
Results on the proximal measure showed that positive CBM-I led to more positive IBs compared to negative, and control training. Further, positive CBM-I led to more positive IBs on the distal measure as compared to negative CBM-I. However, there were no differential training effects on panic-related symptomatology triggered via the provocation tasks.
Conclusion
The findings indicate a limited generalization of the effects of CBM-I on IBs and panic-related symptoms. Potential means to improve generalization, such as applying more nuanced measures and combining CBM-I with psychoeducation are discussed.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes MQ Mental Health Research NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Clinical Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference59 articles.
1. Beard, C., Fuchs, C., Asnaani, A., Schulson, M., Schofield, C. A., Clerkin, E. M., & Weisberg, R. B. (2016). A Pilot Open Trial of Cognitive Bias modification for panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(6), 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9790-0. 2. Ben-Shachar, M., Lüdecke, D., & Makowski, D. (2020). Effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(56), 2815. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815. 3. Blackwell, S. E., Woud, M. L., & MacLeod, C. (2017). A question of control? Examining the role of control conditions in experimental psychopathology using the Example of Cognitive Bias Modification Research. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, E54. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.41. 4. Bös, K., Abel, T., Woll, A., Niemann, S., Tittlbach, S., & Schott, N. (2002). Der Fragebogen zur Erfassung des motorischen Funktionsstatus (FFB-Mot). Diagnostica, 48(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.48.2.101. 5. Bowler, J. O., Mackintosh, B., Dunn, B. D., Mathews, A., Dalgleish, T., & Hoppitt, L. (2012). A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: Effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(6), 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029932.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|