1. Alzabeebee, S., Mohamad, S. A., & Al-Hamd, R. K. S. (2022). Surrogate models to predict maximum dry unit weight, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio form grain size distribution curve. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 23(12), 2733–2750. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2021.1995471
2. Putri, E. E., Rao, N. S. V. K., & Mannan, M. A. (2012). Evaluation of modulus of elasticity and modulus of subgrade reaction of soils using CBR test. Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 2(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20120201.05
3. Narzary, B. K., & Ahamad, K. U. (2018). Estimating elastic modulus of California bearing ratio test sample using finite element model. Construction and Building Materials, 175, 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.228
4. Choudhary, D. K., & Joshi, Y. P. (2014). A detailed study of Cbr method for flexible pavement design. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(6), 239–253.
5. Hajiannia, A., Dorobati, M. T., Kasaeian, S., & Baghbadorani, S. B. (2017, January). Correlation between the results of the PLT and CBR tests to determine the elasticity modulus. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on geotechnical and geophysical site characterisation, ISC 2016 (Vol. 1, pp. 701–706). Australian Geomechanics Society.