Community-Engaged Data Science (CEDS): A Case Study of Working with Communities to Use Data to Inform Change
-
Published:2024-07-03
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0094-5145
-
Container-title:Journal of Community Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Community Health
Author:
Olvera Ramona G.ORCID, Plagens Courtney, Ellison Sylvia, Klingler Kesla, Kuntz Amy K., Chase Rachel P.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractData-informed decision making is a critical goal for many community-based public health research initiatives. However, community partners often encounter challenges when interacting with data. The Community-Engaged Data Science (CEDS) model offers a goal-oriented, iterative guide for communities to collaborate with research data scientists through data ambassadors. This study presents a case study of CEDS applied to research on the opioid epidemic in 18 counties in Ohio as part of the HEALing Communities Study (HCS). Data ambassadors provided a pivotal role in empowering community coalitions to translate data into action using key steps of CEDS which included: data landscapes identifying available data in the community; data action plans from logic models based on community data needs and gaps of data; data collection/sharing agreements; and data systems including portals and dashboards. Throughout the CEDS process, data ambassadors emphasized sustainable data workflows, supporting continued data engagement beyond the HCS. The implementation of CEDS in Ohio underscored the importance of relationship building, timing of implementation, understanding communities’ data preferences, and flexibility when working with communities. Researchers should consider implementing CEDS and integrating a data ambassador in community-based research to enhance community data engagement and drive data-informed interventions to improve public health outcomes.
Funder
NIH HEAL Initiative
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Lepri, B., Staiano, J., Sangokoya, D., Letouzé, E., & Oliver, N. (2017). The tyranny of data? The bright and dark sides of data-driven decision-making for social good. In T. Cerquitelli, D. Quercia, & F. Pasquale (Eds.), Transparent data mining for big and small data (pp. 3–24). Springer. 2. Ryan, G. W., Bloom, E. W., Lowsky, D. J., Linthicum, M. T., Juday, T., Rosenblatt, L., & Sayles, J. N. (2014). Data-driven decision-making tools to improve public resource allocation for care and prevention of HIV/AIDS. Health Affairs, 33(3), 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1155 3. Hansotte, E., Bowman, E., Gibson, P. J., Dixon, B. E., Madden, V. R., & Caine, V. A. (2021). Supporting health equity through data-driven decision-making: A local health department response to COVID-19. American Journal of Public Health, 111(S3), S197–S200. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306421 4. Wong, E. Y., Schachter, A., Collins, H. N., Song, L., Ta, M. L., Dawadi, S., & Laurent, A. A. (2021). Cross-sector monitoring and evaluation framework: Social, economic, and health conditions impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 111(S3), S215–S223. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306422 5. Gostin, L. O., Hodge, J. G., Jr., & Noe, S. A. (2017). Reframing the opioid epidemic as a national emergency. JAMA, 318(16), 1539–1540. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.13358
|
|