Exploring Trust in Research Among Black American Men at a Health Promotion Symposium in Rural North Carolina

Author:

Lloyd Shawnta L.ORCID,Williams Kelvin Lamonte,Byrd Goldie S.

Abstract

AbstractDespite efforts to diversify research and health programs, Black American men remain a “hard-to-reach” population while collectively suffering from some of the worst health outcomes in the United States. Faith- and community-based approaches have shown potential to engage Black Americans in health promotion and health research activities. The purpose of this article is to examine health research participation and trust in research among a sample of Black American men in rural North Carolina who attended a community-based health symposium, culturally tailored for Black American men (n = 112). A cross-sectional survey was administered among men to learn about health status, health concerns, and perception of health research. Among 106 men who completed the survey, most reported no prior participation in health research (68.87%), but almost a third of men reported interest in participating in health research. No significant differences in trust in research was found based on interest in research participation (interested in research participation, not interested in research participation, no response), presenting an opportunity to increase the trustworthiness of medical institutions and build relationships with this population. These findings will inform future research and health programming for Black American men in rural locations.

Funder

Wake Forest University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Ethical and Legal Issues Relating to the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Studies, Mastroianni, A. C., Faden, R., & Federman, D. (Eds.). (1994). Women and health research: Ethical and legal issues of including women in clinical studies: Volume I (pp. 103–43). National Academies Press (US). NIH Revitalization Act of 1993, Public Law. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236531/

2. Ma, M. A., Gutiérrez, D. E., Frausto, J. M., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2021). Minority representation in clinical trials in the United States: Trends over the past 25 years. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 96(1), 264–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.10.027

3. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. (n.d.). Retrieved August 21 (2023). from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/IPE120221

4. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2017, July 3). African American health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved August 21, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aahealth/index.html

5. Noonan, A. S., Velasco-Mondragon, H. E., & Wagner, F. A. (2016). Improving the health of African americans in the USA: An overdue opportunity for social justice. Public Health Reviews, 37(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-016-0025-4

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3