1. Armstrong, P. W., Caverson, M. M., Adams, L., Taylor, M., Olley, P. M. (1997), Evaluation of the heart and stroke foundation of canada research scholarship program: Research productivity and impact, Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 13(5): 507–516.
2. Bakanic, V., Mcphail, C., Simon, R. J. (1987), The manuscript review and decision-making process, American Sociological Review, 52(5): 631–642.
3. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. D. (2003), Begutachtung durch Fachkollegen in der Wissenschaft. Stand der Forschung zur Reliabilität, Fairness und Validität des Peer-Review-Verfahrens. In: Schwarz, S., Teichler, U. (Eds), Universität auf dem Prüfstand. Konzepte und Befunde der Hochschulforschung. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 211–230.
4. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. D. (2005), Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees’ decisions, Scientometrics, 63(2): 297–320.
5. Bornstein, R. F. (1991), The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(1): 138–9.