Analyzing the impact of companies on AI research based on publications
-
Published:2023-11-24
Issue:1
Volume:129
Page:31-63
-
ISSN:0138-9130
-
Container-title:Scientometrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Scientometrics
Author:
Färber MichaelORCID, Tampakis Lazaros
Abstract
AbstractArtificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most momentous technologies of our time. Thus, it is of major importance to know which stakeholders influence AI research. Besides researchers at universities and colleges, researchers in companies have hardly been considered in this context. In this article, we consider how the influence of companies on AI research can be made measurable on the basis of scientific publishing activities. We compare academic- and company-authored AI publications published in the last decade and use scientometric data from multiple scholarly databases to look for differences across these groups and to disclose the top contributing organizations. While the vast majority of publications is still produced by academia, we find that the citation count an individual publication receives is significantly higher when it is (co–)authored by a company. Furthermore, using a variety of altmetric indicators, we notice that publications with company participation receive considerably more attention online. Finally, we place our analysis results in a broader context and present targeted recommendations to safeguard a harmonious balance between academia and industry in the realm of AI research.
Funder
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference50 articles.
1. Abdalla, M., & Abdalla, M. (2021). The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the Threat on Academic Integrity. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New York, NY, USA, p 287-297, https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462563 2. Ahmed, N., & Wahed, M. (2020). The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Research. CoRR abs/2010.15581, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15581 3. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158–2440. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575 4. Alom, MZ., Taha, T.M., Yakopcic, C., Westberg, S., Sidike, P., Nasrin, M.S., Essen, B.C.V., Awwal, A.A.S., & Asari, V.K. (2018). The History Began from AlexNet: A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approaches. CoRR abs/1803.01164, http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01164 5. Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|