Abstract
AbstractWe examine the link between a country’s average citation impact and both national research assessment and international collaboration. Our analysis finds little synchrony between national policies and performance change. We do find extensive, synchronous, cross-national change, however, despite a diversity of national research strategies. Specifically, during 1981–2020, there are synchronous cross-national changes in bilateral, and later multilateral, collaboration. We deconstruct the citation indicators and show that the average citation impact of domestic research and of collaborative research changes little for most countries. Net increases in average national citation impact have instead been driven by rising collaboration and the emerging global network. Greater collaboration enables greater subject diversity, contributes to convergence of subjects, and influences performance indicators. Coincidentally, it also results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average impact than the world average. These effects suggest a need both to strengthen policy analysis of the global context and to construct proper performance indicators when developing research strategy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Adams, J & Smith, D.N. (2002). Maintaining Research Excellence and Volume. A report to the Higher Education Funding Councils. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2002/rd08_02/
2. Adams J. (2007). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions, pp. 44. Universities UK, London. ISBN 978 1 84036 165 4 http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Pages/Publication-275.aspx
3. Adams, J. & Gurney, K. A. (2018). Bilateral and multilateral coauthorship and citation impact: patterns in UK and US international collaboration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00012/full
4. Adams J, Rogers G, Smart W, Szomszor M (2020) Longitudinal variation in national research publication portfolios: steps required to index balance and evenness. Quantitative Science Studies, 1, 1182–1202. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00073
5. Adams, J. (1998). Benchmarking international research. Nature, 396, 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/25219