National research impact is driven by global collaboration, not rising performance

Author:

Adams JonathanORCID,Szomszor MartinORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe examine the link between a country’s average citation impact and both national research assessment and international collaboration. Our analysis finds little synchrony between national policies and performance change. We do find extensive, synchronous, cross-national change, however, despite a diversity of national research strategies. Specifically, during 1981–2020, there are synchronous cross-national changes in bilateral, and later multilateral, collaboration. We deconstruct the citation indicators and show that the average citation impact of domestic research and of collaborative research changes little for most countries. Net increases in average national citation impact have instead been driven by rising collaboration and the emerging global network. Greater collaboration enables greater subject diversity, contributes to convergence of subjects, and influences performance indicators. Coincidentally, it also results in all large nations apparently achieving higher average impact than the world average. These effects suggest a need both to strengthen policy analysis of the global context and to construct proper performance indicators when developing research strategy.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Adams, J & Smith, D.N. (2002). Maintaining Research Excellence and Volume. A report to the Higher Education Funding Councils. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2002/rd08_02/

2. Adams J. (2007). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions, pp. 44. Universities UK, London. ISBN 978 1 84036 165 4 http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Pages/Publication-275.aspx

3. Adams, J. & Gurney, K. A. (2018). Bilateral and multilateral coauthorship and citation impact: patterns in UK and US international collaboration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00012/full

4. Adams J, Rogers G, Smart W, Szomszor M (2020) Longitudinal variation in national research publication portfolios: steps required to index balance and evenness. Quantitative Science Studies, 1, 1182–1202. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00073

5. Adams, J. (1998). Benchmarking international research. Nature, 396, 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/25219

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3