Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we propose the adoption of moral philosophy and in particular normative ethics, to clarify the concept of “good” evaluation of “research practices”. Using MacIntyre (1985)’s notion of a practice we argue that research is a form of social practice. As a result of this characterization, we claim that research practice typically requires three typologies of researcher: the leader, the good researcher and the honest researcher. Reflecting on what is a “good” research practice and on what is the role of researchers in it provides insight into some aspects of both the self-assessment process and how this promotes individual improvement. Moreover, this kind of reflection helps us to describe the functions (missions) of the research practices. A “good” evaluation should take into account all the building constituents of a “good” research practice and should be able to discriminate between good and bad research practices, while enforcing the functions of good research practices. We believe that these reflections may be the starting point for a paradigm shift in the evaluation of research practices which replaces an evaluation centred on products with an evaluation focused on the functions of these practices. In the last sections of the paper, we introduce and discuss an important aspect for the implementation of the proposed framework. This relates to the assessment of the virtues of researchers involved in a good research practice. Some examples of questions and preliminary items to include in a questionnaire for the assessment of Virtues in Research Practices are also provided.
Funder
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Sapienza Università di Roma
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference67 articles.
1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Stud. High. Educ., 33(1), 17–31.
2. ALLEA (2017) The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, last accessed at https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf on 6 June 2020
3. Ardal, P. S. (1966). Passion and Value in Hume's Treatise. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Baier, A. (1991). A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献