Abstract
AbstractThe relationship between international collaboration and scientific impact is studied in the context of South American universities. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the strength of this relationship using nonparametric statistical methods. The records are the 244,300 papers published in journals indexed in Scopus (2011–2020) by researchers affiliated to 10 South American public universities and extracted with Scival support. There is a marked trend of collaborative work, since 93% of publications were collaborative at institutional, national or international level, with a higher percentage of international collaboration. A refined analysis of the geographic collaboration of publications in Q1 journals further evidences the frequency of international collaboration. In the top 4 collaborating partner institutions for each university, the presence of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique of France (CNRS) is observed, followed by the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research of Argentina (Conicet). It is proven that there is a statistically significant relationship (p < .01) in each of the 10 universities between collaboration (number of countries) and normalized impact (FWCI). The results confirmed the hypothesis of this study and the authors provide practical recommendations for science policy makers and researchers, including the promotion of strategic collaboration between different institutional sectors of society to increase the impact of publications.
Funder
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference52 articles.
1. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003
2. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2016). A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 646–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.006
3. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
4. Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a
5. Andalia, R. C., Rodríguez, M. N., Font, J. C., Hechavarría, I. G., Zaragoza, I. C., & Pupo, J. C. G. (2016). Papel de la colaboración científica en el impacto de la investigación en salud de cuba en el contexto de América Latina. Revista Cubana De Información En Ciencias De La Salud, 27(1), 56–74.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献