Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas

Author:

Basson IsabelORCID,Blanckenberg Jaco P.ORCID,Prozesky HeidiORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study is one of the first that uses the recently introduced open access (OA) labels in the Web of Science (WoS) metadata to investigate whether OA articles published in Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) listed journals experience a citation advantage in comparison to subscription journal articles, specifically those of which no self-archived versions are available. Bibliometric data on all articles and reviews indexed in WoS, and published from 2013 to 2015, were analysed. In addition to normalised citation score (NCS), we used two additional measures of citation advantage: whether an article was cited at all; and whether an article is among the most frequently cited percentile of articles within its respective subject area (pptopX %). For each WoS subject area, the strength of the relationship between access status (whether an article was published in an OA journal) and each of these three measures was calculated. We found that OA journal articles experience a citation advantage in very few subject areas and, in most of these subject areas, the citation advantage was found on only a single measure of citation advantage, namely whether the article was cited at all. Our results lead us to conclude that access status accounts for little of the variability in the number of citations an article accumulates. The methodology and the calculations that were used in this study are described in detail and we believe that the lessons we learnt, and the recommendations we make, will be of much use to future researchers interested in using the WoS OA labels, and to the field of citation advantage in general.

Funder

National Research Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Reference41 articles.

1. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021919228368.

2. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.5.372.

3. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Campbell, D., Caruso, J., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., et al. (2014). Evolution of open access policies and availability, 1996–2013. RTD-B6-PP-2011-2: Study to develop a set of indicators to measure open access. Report. Science-Metrix. Retrieved from August 20, 2017 from http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d_4.5_sm_ec_dg-rtd_oa_policies_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v05p_0.pdf.

4. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., et al. (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world level—1996–2013. RTD-B6-PP-2011-2: Study to develop a set of indicators to measure open access. Report. Science-Metrix. Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf.

5. Basson, I. (2019). An investigation of open access citation advantage through multiple measures and across subject areas for articles published from 2005 to 2014. PhD thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. Retrieved January 15, 2020 from http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/105966.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3