Abstract
AbstractIn order to be able to provide thorough and timely coverage on the most recent scientific research, science journalists frequently rely on embargoed information sent to them by publishers of scientific journals. In such embargo e-mails, publishers purposefully bring selected upcoming releases to the journalists’ attention a few days in advance of their publication. Little is known on how this early highlighting of certain research articles affects their later citations or altmetrics. We present an exploratory case study with the aim of assessing the effects of such promotion activities on scientific articles’ bibliometric and altmetric indicators. In a treatment–control design, we analyze citation counts and eight types of altmetrics of 715 articles published between 2016 and 2017 whose DOIs have been mentioned in embargo e-mails and compare these to articles from the same journal issues that have not been highlighted in embargo e-mails. Descriptive statistics and Mann–Whitney-U tests reveal significant advantages for promoted articles across all regarded metrics three to four years after their publication. Particularly large differences can be seen regarding numbers of mentions in mainstream media, in blogs, on Twitter, and on Facebook. Our findings suggest that scholarly publishers exert significant influence over which research articles will receive attention and visibility in various (social) media. Also, regarding utilizations of metrics for evaluative purposes, the observed effects of promotional activities on indicators might constitute a factor of undesirable influence that currently does not receive the amount of consideration in scientometric assessments that it should receive.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference32 articles.
1. Adie, E. (2016). The rise of altmetrics. In A. Tattersall (Ed.), Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics (pp. 67–82). Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301515.005
2. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
3. Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005
4. Bowman, T. D., & Hassan, S. (2019). Science News and Altmetrics: Looking at EurekAlert!. Presented at altmetrics19. The 2019 Altmetrics Workshop. Stirling, Scotland. http://altmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Bowman_altmetrics19_paper_6.pdf
5. Chapman, S., Nguyen, T. N., & White, C. (2007). Press-released papers are more downloaded and cited. Tobacco Control, 16(1), 71–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2006.019034
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献