1. Armstrong, J. S. (1982). Barriers to scientific contributions: The authors formula. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(02), 197–199.
2. Bornmann, L. (2008). Scientific peer review. An analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories. Human Architecture-Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 6(2), 23–38.
3. Bornmann, L. (2012). The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review. Scientometrics, 91, 857–862.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0547-y
.
4. Bornmann, L. (2014). Book Review: Gould, T.H.P. (2013). Do we still need peer review? An argument for change. Scarecrow Press: Plymouth, UK. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 209–213.
5. Brown, R. J. C. (2004). The use of double anonymity in peer review: A decision whose time has come? Quality Assurance, 11, 103–109.