Abstract
AbstractThe state of research in the Science of Team Science is characterised by a wide range of findings on how successful research collaboration should be structured. However, it remains unclear how the multitude of findings can be put into a hierarchical order with regard to their significance for the success of cooperation. This is where the article comes in: based on the state of research, the question of which intra- and interpersonal factors are most significant for the success of a research team is investigated. In order to explore the ten most important reasons for the success of a research collaboration, a Random Forest classifier is specified that predicts the success of research collaborations on the basis of 51 input variables. The analyses presented in the paper are based on representative survey data on n = 1.417 principal investigators and spokespersons of ongoing and completed research clusters funded by the German Research Foundation. The success of a research cluster is operationalised as the extent to which it has achieved the goals that it communicated to the funding agency before it began. Highly realistic and clear research objectives are central to the success of research clusters, as are comprehensive agreement on objectives, close interconnection of the subprojects’ research work and a fair and trusting cooperation climate.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung GmbH (DZHW)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference108 articles.
1. Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., Haas, J., & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1 Pt 1), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.09.007
3. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2014). Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2275–2294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1185-3
4. Ambrasat, J., Heger, C., & Rucker, A. (2022). DZHW-Wissenschaftsbefragung 2019. https://metadata.fdz.dzhw.eu/public/files/data-packages/stu-scs2019
5. Ambrasat, J., Heger, C., & Rucker, A. (2022). DZHW-Wissenschaftsbefragung 2019. https://metadata.fdz.dzhw.eu/public/files/data-packages/stu-scs2019$-2.0.0/attachments/scs2019_
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献