Abstract
AbstractIn this study we investigated whether open access could assist the broader dissemination of scientific research in Climate Action (Sustainable Development Goal 13) via news outlets. We did this by comparing (i) the share of open and non-open access documents in different Climate Action topics, and their news counts, and (ii) the mean of news counts for open access and non-open access documents. The data set of this study comprised 70,206 articles and reviews in Sustainable Development Goal 13, published during 2014–2018, retrieved from SciVal. The number of news mentions for each document was obtained from Altmetrics Details Page API using their DOIs, whereas the open access statuses were obtained using Unpaywall.org. The analysis in this paper was done using a combination of (Latent Dirichlet allocation) topic modelling, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. The covariates included in the regression analysis were features related to authors, country, journal, institution, funding, readability, news source category and topic. Using topic modelling, we identified 10 topics, with topics 4 (meteorology) [21%], 5 (adaption, mitigation, and legislation) [18%] and 8 (ecosystems and biodiversity) [14%] accounting for 53% of the research in Sustainable Development Goal 13. Additionally, the results of regression analysis showed that while keeping all the variables constant in the model, open access papers in Climate Action had a news count advantage (8.8%) in comparison to non-open access papers. Our findings also showed that while a higher share of open access documents in topics such as topic 9 (Human vulnerability to risks) might not assist with its broader dissemination, in some others such as topic 5 (adaption, mitigation, and legislation), even a lower share of open access documents might accelerate its broad communication via news outlets.
Funder
Chalmers University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference52 articles.
1. Álvarez-Bornstein, B., & Costas, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between research funding and social media: disciplinary analysis of the distribution of funding acknowledgements and Twitter mention in scientific publications. Paper presented at the STI 2018 Leiden https://hdl.handle.net/1887/65233.
2. Andersen, R. (2008). Robust regression for the linear model. Modern methods for robust regression (pp. 48–70). SAGE Publishing Thousand Oaks.
3. Andı, S. (2020). How People Access News about Climate Change. Retrieved from Oxford:
4. Areia, N. P., Intrigliolo, D., Tavares, A., Mendes, J. M., & Sequeira, M. D. (2019). The role of media between expert and lay knowledge: A study of Iberian media coverage on climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 682, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.191
5. Barkemeyer, R., Figge, F., & Holt, D. (2013). Sustainability-related media coverage and socioeconomic development: A regional and North-South perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(4), 716–740. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11176j
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献