The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI

Published:2023-09-03 Issue:11 Volume:128 Page:6177-6193
ISSN:0138-9130
Container-title:Scientometrics
language:en
Short-container-title:Scientometrics

Author:

Yu Bo,Shu Fei^ORCID

Funder

National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Cao, C., Li, N., Li, X., & Liu, L. (2013). Reforming China’s S&T system. Science, 341(6145), 460.

2. Chu, C.-F., Liu, Y.-Y., & Xiong, X.-Y. (2003). The influence of disciplinary distribution of SSCI journals on the evaluation index of social science research. Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology, 24(11), 19–22.

3. Farys, R., & Wolbring, T. (2021). Matthew effects in science and the serial diffusion of ideas: Testing old ideas with new methods. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 505–526.

4. Gong, F., & Qu, M. (2010). Nan jing da xue ge an: SCI ying ru ping jia ti xi dui zhong guo da lu ji chu yan jiu de ying xiang (A case study of Nanjing University: The influence of introducing SCI into assessment system on the quality of basic research in Mainland Chinese universities). Higher Education of Sciences, 2010(3), 4–17.

5. Guns, R., Sīle, L., Eykens, J., Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. (2018). A comparison of cognitive and organizational classification of publications in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 116(6), 1093–1111.