1. Adams, J., Jackson, L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England by Evidence Ltd.
2. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242
3. Boyack, K., & Klavans, R. (2014). Atypical combinations are confounded by disciplinary effects.
4. Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, 534(7609), 684–687.
5. Chan, L. M., & Hodges, T. (2007). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (3rd ed.). Scrarecrow Press.