Mapping the field of psychology: Trends in research topics 1995–2015

Author:

Wieczorek OliverORCID,Unger SaïdORCID,Riebling Jan,Erhard LukasORCID,Koß Christian,Heiberger Raphael

Abstract

AbstractWe map the topic structure of psychology utilizing a sample of over 500,000 abstracts of research articles and conference proceedings spanning two decades (1995–2015). To do so, we apply structural topic models to examine three research questions: (i) What are the discipline’s most prevalent research topics? (ii) How did the scientific discourse in psychology change over the last decades, especially since the advent of neurosciences? (iii) And was this change carried by high impact (HI) or less prestigious journals? Our results reveal that topics related to natural sciences are trending, while their ’counterparts’ leaning to humanities are declining in popularity. Those trends are even more pronounced in the leading outlets of the field. Furthermore, our findings indicate a continued interest in methodological topics accompanied by the ascent of neurosciences and related methods and technologies (e.g. fMRI’s). At the same time, other established approaches (e.g. psychoanalysis) become less popular and indicate a relative decline of topics related to the social sciences and the humanities.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Reference60 articles.

1. Anderson, A., McFarland, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2012). Towards a computational history of the ACL: 1980-2008. In Proceedings of the ACL-2012 special workshop on rediscovering 50 years of discoveries, association for computational linguistics (pp. 13–21).

2. Arora, S., Ge, R., Halpern, Y., Mimno, D., Moitra, A., Sontag, D., et al. (2013). A practical algorithm for topic modeling with provable guarantees. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 280–288).

3. Bail, C. A. (2014). The cultural environment: Measuring culture with big data. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), 465–482.

4. Benjafield, J. G. (2019). Keyword frequencies in anglophone psychology. Scientometrics, 118(3), 1051–1064.

5. Benjafield, J. G. (2020). Vocabulary sharing among subjects belonging to the hierarchy of sciences. Scientometrics, 125, 1965–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03671-7.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3