Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups in excellencemapping.net: a new release of the excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores

Author:

Bornmann LutzORCID,Mutz RüdigerORCID,Haunschild RobinORCID,de Moya-Anegon FelixORCID,de Almeida Madeira Clemente Mirko,Stefaner Moritz

Abstract

AbstractIn over five years, Bornmann, Stefaner, de Moya Anegon, and Mutz (2014b) and Bornmann, Stefaner, de Moya Anegón, and Mutz (2014c, 2015) have published several releases of the www.excellencemapping.net tool revealing (clusters of) excellent institutions worldwide based on citation data. With the new release, a completely revised tool has been published. It is not only based on citation data (bibliometrics), but also Mendeley data (altmetrics). Thus, the institutional impact measurement of the tool has been expanded by focusing on additional status groups besides researchers such as students and librarians. Furthermore, the visualization of the data has been completely updated by improving the operability for the user and including new features such as institutional profile pages. In this paper, we describe the datasets for the current excellencemapping.net tool and the indicators applied. Furthermore, the underlying statistics for the tool and the use of the web application are explained.

Funder

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Reference91 articles.

1. Aduku, K. J., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2016). Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineering fields. In I. Ràfols, J. Molas-Gallart, E. Castro-Martínez & R. Woolley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21 ST International Conference on Science and Technology Indicator. València, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de València.

2. Aumüller, D., & Rahm, E. (2011). Affiliation analysis of database publications. SIGMOD Record, 40(1), 26–31.

3. Bar-Ilan, J., Halevi, G., & Milojević, S. (2019). Differences between altmetric data sources—A case study. Journal of Altmetrics, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.4

4. Barthel, S., Tönnies, S., Köhncke, B., Siehndel, P., & Balke, W.-T. (2015). What does Twitter measure? Influence of diverse user groups in altmetrics. In Paper presented at the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Knoxville, TN, USA.

5. Blümel, C., Gauch, S., & Beng, F. (2017). Altmetrics and its intellectual predecessors: Patterns of argumentation and conceptual development. In P. Larédo (Ed.), Proceedings of the Science, Technology, & Innovation Indicators Conference "Open indicators: Innovation, participation and actor-based STI indicators". Paris, France.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3