Author:
Falk Delgado Alberto,Garretson Gregory,Falk Delgado Anna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference12 articles.
1. Bornmann, L., Weymuth, C., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). A content analysis of referees’ comments: How do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low or high-impact journal differ? Scientometrics,
83, 493–506.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0011-4
.
2. Fletcher, R. H., & Fletcher, S. (2003). The effectiveness of editorial peer review. London: BMJ Books.
3. Fortanet, I. (2008). Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,
7, 27–37.
4. Glonti, K., Hren, D., Carter, S., & Schroter, S. (2017). Linguistic features in peer reviewer reports: How peer reviewers communicate their recommendations.
https://peerreviewcongress.org/prc17-0234
.
5. Groves, T. (2010). Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes. BMJ,
341, c6424.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6424
.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献