1. Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2015). Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? Journal of Informetrics,9(2), 408–418.
2. Bornmann, L., Tekles, A., Zhang, H. H., & Ye, F. Y. (2019). Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data. Journal of Informetrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03233.
3. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On sleeping beauties, princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation,19(3), 195–202.
4. Dey, R., Roy, A., Chakraborty, T., & Ghosh, S. (2017). Sleeping beauties in computer science: Characterization and early identification. Scientometrics,113(3), 1645–1663.
5. Du, J., & Wu, Y. (2016). A bibliometric framework for identifying “princes” who wake up the “sleeping beauty” in challenge-type scientific discoveries. Journal of Data and Information Science,9(1), 50–68.