Abstract
AbstractOne of the key channels of scholarly knowledge exchange are scholarly events such as conferences, workshops, symposiums, etc.; such events are especially important and popular in Computer Science, Engineering, and Natural Sciences.
However, scholars encounter problems in finding relevant information about upcoming events and statistics on their historic evolution.
In order to obtain a better understanding of scholarly event characteristics in four fields of science, we analyzed the metadata of scholarly events of four major fields of science, namely Computer Science, Physics, Engineering, and Mathematics using Scholarly Events Quality Assessment suite, a suite of ten metrics.
In particular, we analyzed renowned scholarly events belonging to five sub-fields within Computer Science, namely World Wide Web, Computer Vision, Software Engineering, Data Management, as well as Security and Privacy.
This analysis is based on a systematic approach using descriptive statistics as well as exploratory data analysis. The findings are on the one hand interesting to observe the general evolution and success factors of scholarly events; on the other hand, they allow (prospective) event organizers, publishers, and committee members to assess the progress of their event over time and compare it to other events in the same field; and finally, they help researchers to make more informed decisions when selecting suitable venues for presenting their work.
Based on these findings, a set of recommendations has been concluded to different stakeholders, involving event organizers, potential authors, proceedings publishers, and sponsors. Our comprehensive dataset of scholarly events of the aforementioned fields is openly available in a semantic format and maintained collaboratively at OpenResearch.org.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
DFG project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference32 articles.
1. Agarwal, S., Mittal, N., & Sureka, A. (2016). A scientometric analysis of 9 ACM SIGWEB cooperating conferences. ACM SIGWEB Newsletter(Autumn), 6, 1–15.
2. Alexiou, G., Vahdati, S., Lange, C., Papastefanatos, G., & Lohmann, S. (2016). Openaire lod services: Scholarly communication data as linked data. In International workshop on semantic, analytics, visualization (pp. 45–50).
3. Ameloot, T. J., Marx, M., Martens, W., Neven, F., & van Wees, J. (2011). 30 years of PODS in facts and figures. SIGMOD Record, 40(3), 54–60.
4. Aumüller, D., & Rahm, E. (2011). Affiliation analysis of database publications. SIGMOD Record, 40(1), 26–31.
5. Bakare, V., & Lewison, G. (2017). Country over-citation ratios. Scientometrics, 113(2), 1199–1207.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献