Abstract
AbstractThe funding from the European Union’s Framework Programs for Research and Innovation (EU FPs) is skewed across European countries and institutions. The goal of this article is to deepen our understanding of this skewness by incorporating a regional (NUTS-2) and a sectoral (higher education sector and private sector) perspective when studying the ability to attract 71.6 billion euros of research funding distributed by the EU Framework Programs between 2007 and 2020, and to explore how it changed from FP7 to Horizon 2020. We explore the ability to attract grant funding per unit of R&D personnel, and how it is affected by a region’s volume of research personnel, R&D investments, research intensity, level of development, and mediated by the amount of funding requested. In the private sector, we find that several Southern European regions are highly capable of attracting funding, primarily through a high proposal intensity, e.g., large amounts of funding requested. In the higher education sector, regions in the so-called “blue banana” are particularly able to attract funding, due to high levels of R&D investments, strong research intensity, and a high amount of funding requested. From FP7 to Horizon 2020, we observe increasing divergence in the ability to attract funding in the private sector, in favor of peripheral regions, which aligns with the aims of the European Commission's cohesion policy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference92 articles.
1. Abbott, A. (2020). Farewell to Europe’s horizon 2020’. Nature, 588, 371.
2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2015). A new approach to measure the scientific strengths of territories. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1167–1177.
3. Amoroso, S., Coad, A., & Grassano, N. (2018). European R&D networks: A snapshot from the 7th EU framework programme. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(5–6), 404–419.
4. Anciaux, D., Neves, E., van der Zee, F., van der Giessen, A., Rammer, C., and Pellens, M. (2016). Mapping the regional embeddedness of the NMP programme. Final report of the project. Brussels, European Commission.
5. Andersson, D. E., Andersson, Å. E., Hårsman, B., & Yang, X. (2020). The geography of science in 12 European countries: A NUTS-2-level analysis. Scientometrics, 124, 1099–1125.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献