Abstract
Abstract
Background
Citizen participation in the generation of scientific knowledge is one of the major challenges facing science and technology systems. This study takes a psychosocial approach to analyzing the process whereby citizens participate in science.
Method
A specific questionnaire was answered by 1002 residents of Spain belonging to different age groups, occupations, and education levels.
Results
Cluster analysis revealed two profiles: a minority group of people who are well informed, motivated, and interested, recognize the value and impact of science, and would be willing to donate money for and participate in science projects, and a group of people of the opposite profile who feel little if any interest in science. A logistic regression model designed to find the variables that contribute the most to participation showed that gender is a major predictor of participation and that knowing people who have participated in scientific projects is another important motivating factor.
Conclusions
Only a minority group of the population (young, university-educated women) participates prominently in scientific projects. Strategic initiatives are needed to increase the engagement of institutions and the public in citizen science.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Abadal, E. (2021). Ciencia abierta: Un modelo con piezas por encajar. Arbor, 197(799), a588–a588. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799003
2. Agnello, G., Vercammen, A., & Knight, A. T. (2022). Understanding citizen scientists’ willingness to invest in, and advocate for, conservation. Biological Conservation, 265, 109422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109422
3. Asingizwe, D., Poortvliet, P. M., Koenraadt, C. J. M., van Vliet, A. J. H., Ingabire, C. M., Mutesa, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2020). Why (not) participate in citizen science? Motivational factors and barriers to participate in a citizen science program for malaria control in Rwanda. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0237396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237396
4. Blanco, A. (2023). Uso y Abuso del Término “Psicosocial” en el Campo de la Intervención Social. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 44(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol.3011
5. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519688 (Online submission)