Evolution of number of citations per article in Materials Science: possible causes and effect on the impact factor of journals

Author:

Ariza-Guerrero Ana M.,Blázquez J. SebastiánORCID

Abstract

AbstractAn overall rise in the citation parameters used in the metrics of scientific publications (i.e. journal impact factor, JIF) has taken place since the last decade of the previous century, coinciding with the electronic distribution of (and access to) scientific literature. This inflation like tendency is herein analyzed in the area of Materials Science and also affects the number of publications. Considering average JIF values, its growth is proportional to the number of publications in the area and to its JIF value, leading to an inhomogeneous boost that preferentially benefits those journals with high JIF. An elevation in the number of publications per year alone cannot explain this behavior but it occurs due to a continuous and widespread increment in the number of citations per article, which only remains limited when restrictions are applied by journals to the maximum number of pages per article. In this work we observe this positive correlation between the increase in the number of references per article and the overall increase in JIF but, in our analysis, a kink point is observed in consistency with the appearance of online databases, particularly those free available in 2004. Online databases along with the widespread of open access publishing option made the research content easily available to the scientific community contributing to an increasing trend (without apparent saturation) in the number of articles used to contextualize the new scientific contributions.

Funder

Universidad de Sevilla

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Reference46 articles.

1. Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, T., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20936

2. Baas, J., Fennell, C. (2019) When peer reviewers go rogue - Estimated prevalence of citation manipulation by reviewers based on the citation patterns of 69,000 reviewers, 17th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI) on Scientometrics and Informetrics, I, pp.963–974

3. Bray, N. J., & Major, C. H. (2022). Impact factors, altmetrics, and prestige, oh my: The relationship between perceived prestige and objective measures of journal quality. Innovative Higher Education, 47, 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09635-4

4. Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (2018). Research analytics. boosting university productivity and competitiveness through scientometrics. CRC Press.

5. Collins, M. P., & Berge, Z. L. (1994). IPCT journal: A case study of an electronic journal on the internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 771–776.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3