1. Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009a). Document–document similarity approaches and science mapping: experimental comparison of five approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 49–63.
2. Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009b). Textual content, cited references, similarity order, and clustering: an experimental study in the context of science mapping. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol. 2, pp 862–873), Rio de Janeiro.
3. Ahlgren, P., & Jarneving, B. (2008). Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: A comparison of two document–document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping. Scientometrics, 76(2), 273–290.
4. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550–560.
5. Arenas, A., Fernandez, A., & Gomez, S. (2008). Analysis of the structure of complex networks at different resolution levels. New Journal of Physics, 10, Article Number: 053039.