Academic vs. biological age in research on academic careers: a large-scale study with implications for scientifically developing systems
-
Published:2022-04-09
Issue:6
Volume:127
Page:3543-3575
-
ISSN:0138-9130
-
Container-title:Scientometrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Scientometrics
Author:
Kwiek MarekORCID, Roszka WojciechORCID
Abstract
AbstractBiological age is an important sociodemographic factor in studies on academic careers (research productivity, scholarly impact, and collaboration patterns). It is assumed that the academic age, or the time elapsed from the first publication, is a good proxy for biological age. In this study, we analyze the limitations of the proxy in academic career studies, using as an example the entire population of Polish academic scientists and scholars visible in the last decade in global science and holding at least a PhD (N = 20,569). The proxy works well for science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) disciplines; however, for non-STEMM disciplines (particularly for humanities and social sciences), it has a dramatically worse performance. This negative conclusion is particularly important for systems that have only recently visible in global academic journals. The micro-level data suggest a delayed participation of social scientists and humanists in global science networks, with practical implications for predicting biological age from academic age. We calculate correlation coefficients, present contingency analysis of academic career stages with academic positions and age groups, and create a linear multivariate regression model. Our research suggests that in scientifically developing countries, academic age as a proxy for biological age should be used more cautiously than in advanced countries: ideally, it should be used only for STEMM disciplines.
Funder
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference74 articles.
1. Abramo, G., Aksnes, D. W., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2020). Comparison of research productivity of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2), 101023. 2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86, 629–643. 3. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2016). The combined effect of age and seniority on research performance of full professors. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 301–319. 4. Aksnes, D. W., Rørstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2011a). Age and Scientific Performance. A Large-Scale Study of Norwegian Scientists. In: E., Noyons, P., Ngulube, J., Leta, (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011a—the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, (Vol. 1, pp. 34–45), Durban, South Africa, 4–7 July 2011a, ISSI, Leiden University and University of Zululand, 2011. 5. Aksnes, D. W., Rørstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2011b). Are female researchers less cited? A large scale study of Norwegian researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628–636.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|