Abstract
AbstractStandard citation-based bibliometric tools have severe limitations when they are applied to periods in the history of science and the humanities before the advent of now-current citation practices. This paper presents an alternative method involving the extracting and analysis of mentions to map and analyze links between scholars and texts in periods that fall outside the scope of citation-based studies. Focusing on one specific discipline in one particular period and language area—Anglophone philosophy between 1890 and 1979—we describe a procedure to create a mention index by identifying, extracting, and disambiguating mentions in academic publications. Our mention index includes 1,095,765 mention links, extracted from 22,977 articles published in 12 journals. We successfully link 93% of these mentions to specific philosophers, with an estimated precision of 82% to 91%. Moreover, we integrate the mention index into a database named EDHIPHY, which includes data and metadata from multiple sources and enables multidimensional mention analyses. In the final part of the paper, we present four case studies conducted by domain experts, demonstrating the use and the potential of both EDHIPHY and mention analyses more generally.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Università degli Studi di Torino
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Allen, C., & Beavers, T. (2011). Synthese special issue: Representing philosophy. Synthese, 182(2), 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9664-z
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
3. De Bellis, N. (2014). History and Evolution of (Biblio)Metrics. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (pp. 23–44). MIT Press.
4. Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
5. Börner, K. (2010). Atlas of science: Visualizing what we know. MIT Press.