Abstract
AbstractPhilanthropy provides substantial support for science and research—does it do the same for technology and invention? We match patenting outcomes in the United States with philanthropic organizations as listed in the Candid database and find that at least 0.2% of U.S. patenting since 1976 received philanthropic support. After matching philanthropic patents to non-philanthropic patents based on technology, time, and the number of inventors, we find that philanthropic invention is more likely to be done by smaller teams and U.S. based inventors and less likely to rely on science research and non-U.S. prior art. Renewal rates are not significantly different from non-philanthropic patents and philanthropic patents are not more likely to be in underserved areas of technology. Philanthropic supported patents receive significantly fewer future prior art citations, thus implying that philanthropy supported patents are not exceptionally valuable.
Funder
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference9 articles.
1. Alcácer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774–779.
2. Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2020). Philanthropy, innovation and entrepreneurship. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38017-5_3
3. Fleming, L., Marx, M., Green, H., Li, G., & Yao, D. (2019). Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science, 364(6446), 1139–1141.
4. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.
5. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, A., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712.