Abstract
AbstractThe accessory neural arch is an oddly distributed character present in several non-acanthomorph teleostean taxa. Its homology was often implied but never satisfyingly tested. In this study, we attended this pending problem. We analyzed the morphology, development, and systematic distribution of the accessory neural arch in teleosts. Using a comprehensive taxon sampling of cleared and stained specimens, we evaluated if the accessory neural arch fulfils existing homology criteria. We then combined these data with recent genetic phylogenies and ancestral character state estimation to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the accessory neural arch. While its gross morphology and development fit homology criteria, results from ancestral character state estimations suggest multiple independent evolutions within teleosts. Although the accessory neural arch cannot be homologous between several teleostean taxa, the concept of parallelism may explain the presence of such a similar character in a variety of non-acanthomorph teleostean taxa.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental Biology,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference77 articles.
1. Assis LCS (2015) Homology assessment in parsimony and model-based analyses: two sides of the same coin. Cladistics 31:315–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12085
2. Assis LC, Rieppel O (2011) Are monophyly and synapomorphy the same or different? Revisiting the role of morphology in phylogenetics. Cladistics 27:94–102
3. Assis LCS, Santos LM (2014) Phylogenetics is not phylogenomics. Cladistics 30:8–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12028
4. Baldwin CC, Johnson GD (1996) Interrelationships of aulopiformes. In: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson DG (eds) Interrelationships of fishes. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 355–404
5. Bemis W, Forey P (2001) Occipital structure and the posterior limit of the skull in actinopterygians. In: Ahlberg PE (ed) Major events in early vertebrate evolution. Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp 350–369