Whom are you going to call? determinants of @-mentions in Github discussions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Whom are you going to call? determinants of @-mentions in Github discussions

Published:2019-06-07 Issue:6 Volume:24 Page:3904-3932
ISSN:1382-3256
Container-title:Empirical Software Engineering
language:en
Short-container-title:Empir Software Eng

Author:

Kavaler David^ORCID,Devanbu Premkumar,Filkov Vladimir

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Software

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10664-019-09728-3.pdf

Reference66 articles.

1. Ackerman AF, Fowler PJ, Ebenau RG (1984) Software inspections and the industrial production of software. In: Proceedings of a symposium on Software validation: inspection-testing-verification-alternatives. Elsevier North-Holland, Inc, pp 13–40

2. Allison P (2012) When can you safely ignore multicollinearity? https://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity

3. Bandura A (1973) Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice-Hall

4. Bandura A, Walters RH (1977) Social learning theory

5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological) pp 289–300

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Automating discussion structure re-organization for GitHub issues;Expert Systems with Applications;2023-09

2. Modern Code Reviews—Survey of Literature and Practice;ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology;2023-05-26

3. Opportunities and Challenges in Repeated Revisions to Pull-Requests: An Empirical Study;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2022-11-07

4. A systematic process for Mining Software Repositories: Results from a systematic literature review;Information and Software Technology;2022-04

5. Can we benchmark Code Review studies? A systematic mapping study of methodology, dataset, and metric;Journal of Systems and Software;2021-10