Abstract
AbstractIn today’s fast-paced world of rapid technological change, software development teams need to constantly revise their work practices. Not surprisingly, regular reflection on how to become more effective is perceived as one of the most important principles of Agile Software Development. Nevertheless, running an effective and enjoyable retrospective meeting is still a challenge in real environments. As reported by several studies, the Sprint Retrospective is an agile practice most likely to be implemented improperly or sacrificed when teams perform under pressure to deliver. To facilitate the implementation of the practice, some agile coaches have proposed to set up retrospective meetings in the form of retrospective games. However, there has been little research-based evidence to support the positive effects of retrospective games. Our aim is to investigate whether the adoption of retrospective games can improve retrospective meetings in general and lead to positive societal outcomes. In this paper, we report on an Action Research project in which we implemented six retrospective games in six Scrum teams that had experienced common retrospective problems. The received feedback indicates that the approach helped the teams to mitigate many of the “accidental difficulties” pertaining to the Sprint Retrospective, such as lack of structure, dullness, too many complaints, or unequal participation and made the meetings more productive to some degree. Moreover, depending on their individual preferences, different participants perceived different games as having a positive impact on their communication, motivation-and-involvement, and/or creativity, even though there were others, less numerous, who had an opposite view. The advantages and disadvantages of each game as well as eight lessons learned are presented in the paper.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference202 articles.
1. Abt CC (1970) Serious games. Viking Press
2. Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(2):357–376
3. Andriyani Y, Hoda R, Amor R (2017) Reflection in Agile Retrospectives. In: In: 18th International Conference, XP, Cologne, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57633-6_1
4. Akarsu Z, Metin ÖO, Gungor D, Yilmaz M (2018) Towards a Role Playing Game for Exploring the Roles in Scrum to Improve Collaboration Problems. In: 18th European Systems Software and Service Process Improvement and Innovation (EuroSPI), Bilbao, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_21
5. Asch SE (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. In: Psychological Monographs, 70 (9, whole no. 416)
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献