Abstract
AbstractThe principal focus of software product management is to ensure the economic success of the product, which means to prolong the product life as much as possible with modest expenditures to maximizs profits. Software product managers play an important role in the software development organization while being responsible for the strategy, business case, product roadmap, high-level requirements, product deployment (release-management), and retirement plan. This article explores the problems that affect the software product management process, their perceived frequency and perceived severity. The data were collected by a systematic literature review (5 main databases were analyzed), interviews (10 software product managers from IT companies), and surveys (89 participants). 95 software product management problems assigned nonexclusively to 7 areas were identified. 27 commonly mentioned software product management problems were evaluated for their perceived frequency and perceived severity. The problems perceived as the most frequent are: determining the true value of the product that the customer needs, strategy and priorities change frequently, technical debt, working in silos, and balancing between reactive and proactive work. In total, 95 problems have been identified which have been narrowed down to 27 problems based on their occurrence in at least 3 interviews. These selected problems were prioritized by perceived frequency and perceived severity. Some of the identified problems spanned beyond the software product management process itself, but they all affect the work of software product managers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Ankiety PG (2019) GUT CUI https://ankiety.pg.edu.pl/?lang=en. Accessed 23 April 2020
2. AXELOS (2017) Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2® (6th edn)
3. Bekkers W, Brinkkemper S, van Den Bemd L, Mijnhardt F, Wagner C, van De Weerd I (2012) Evaluating the software product management maturity matrix. In: 2012 20th IEEE Int Requir Eng Conf RE 2012 – Proc, pp. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2012.6345839
4. Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80:571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
5. CMMI Institute (2019) CMMI(R) V2.0 Model at-a-glance
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献