Abstract
AbstractGlass fiber (GF) Sheet Molding Compound (SMC) composites are popular lightweight materials due to their good processability. Hybrid SMCs expand the field of operation, combining the high stiffness of unidirectional carbon fibers (CF) with the economic efficiency of GF. Combinations of manufacturing deviations (delamination, varying GF content, CF misorientation) occur during the production of hybrid SMCs and impede the mechanical performance of the part. A function-oriented quality assurance instead of strict tolerances is proposed. Finite element (FE) simulations are computationally too expensive for an assessment within the cycle time. Hence, surrogate models are trained on multiple parameterized FE simulations. The surrogate models shall allow for an individual functional assessment in real-time based on integrated measurement inputs. This work focuses on the generation of parametrized FE simulations for measurement inputs and surrogate modeling. Simulations and surrogate models show acceptable deviations from tensile tests for multiple combinations of manufacturing deviations. The measurement uncertainty of the stiffness prediction is assessed for both the FE simulation and the surrogate models in accordance with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference36 articles.
1. European Commission (2019) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—The European Green Deal. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640. Accessed 25 Aug 2022
2. Bücheler D (2018) Locally continuous-fiber reinforced sheet molding compound. Dissertation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Fraunhofer, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000079163
3. Böhlke T, Henning F, Hrymak A, Kärger L, Weidenmann KA, Wood JT (2019) Continuous—discontinuous fiber-reinforced polymers—an integrated engineering approach, 1st edn. Carl Hanser, Munich. https://doi.org/10.3139/9781569906934
4. Fengler B, Schäferling M, Schäfer B, Bretz L, Lanza G, Häfner B, Hrymak A, Kärger L (2019) Manufacturing uncertainties and resulting robustness of optimized patch positions on continuous-discontinuous fiber reinforced polymer structures. Compos Struct 213:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.063
5. Talreja R (2015) Manufacturing defects in composites and their effects on performance. In: Irving P, Soutis C (eds) Polymer composites in the aerospace industry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-85709-523-7.00005-0