Author:
González Germán,Schulze Volker
Abstract
AbstractThis Special Issue showcases a broad spectrum of fundamental research targeting the in-line measurement and assessment of surface conditions in machining operations. It presents and discusses various measurement approaches, including those based on acoustic emission, micromagnetic fields, the Seebeck effect, and other techniques. These methods are explored for their effectiveness in assessing and ensuring the quality of machined surfaces. The collected research delves into surface modeling techniques and investigates diverse strategies for predicting the effects of process parameters on surface integrity. It also focuses on the strategic selection of these parameters to enhance final component performance. There is a significant emphasis on the evolution of in-process control methods, which are crucial for elevating the quality and functionality of machined surfaces and facilitating unmanned manufacturing. These advancements are instrumental in improving manufacturing efficiency and augmenting the quality of the final products.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference9 articles.
1. Kahles JF, Field M (1967) Paper 4: surface integrity-a new requirement for surfaces generated by material-removal methods. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, conference proceedings 182(11):31–45
2. Jawahir I, Brinksmeier E, M’saoubi R, Aspinwall D, Outeiro J, Meyer D, Umbrello D, Jayal A (2011) Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(2):603–626
3. Stampfer B, González G, Gerstenmeyer M, Schulze V (2021) The present state of surface conditioning in cutting and grinding. J Manuf Mater Process 5(3):92
4. Lube T, Hausotte T, Manske E, Schaefer L (2011) On-machine scatter light measurement of surface topography with noise reduction. J Manuf Sci Eng 133(3):031002
5. Klocke F, Dambon O, Klink A (2012) Surface metrology in production engineering. CIRP Ann 61(2):781–802