Police Powers and Article 5 ECHR: Time for a New Approach to the Interpretation of the Right to Liberty

Author:

Edwards Richard A.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper discusses the approach of British and European Courts to the interpretation and application of the Article 5 ECHR right to liberty when faced with police powers. The paper argues that the long-standing approach of the European Court of Human Rights in Guzzardi v Italy [1980] ECHR 7367/76 is wrong and should be replaced with a new interpretation based on coercion. The paper goes on to argue that a new approach would allow the courts to effectively protect both Convention rights and the rule of law.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law

Reference31 articles.

1. Alexy, Robert. 2002. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Ashworth, Andrew. 2002. Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

3. Blackstone, Sir William. 1765. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Dinton: Clarendon.

4. Chaskalson, Marcus. 2006. Constitutional Law of South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.

5. Council of Europe. 1956. ‘Preparatory Work on Article 5’ (1956) CDH (67), 12. https://www.echr.coe.int/Library/DIGDOC/Travaux/ECHRTravaux-ART5-DH(56)10-EN1674958.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2020.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. LIBERTY AND ITS EXCEPTIONS;International and Comparative Law Quarterly;2023-03-09

2. Legal Grounds for Restrictions of Human Rights in the European Court of Human Rights Case-Law;Access to Justice in Eastern Europe;2021-10-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3