1. Svenson, B., Welander, U., Anneroth, G. and S derfeldt, B.: Exposure parameters and their effects on diagnostic accuracy.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 78: 544–50, 1994.
2. Webber, R., Benton, P. and Ryge, G.: Diagnostic variations in radiographs.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 26: 800–9, 1968.
3. Arnold, L. The influence of exposure conditions (tubevoltage, filtration and exposure time) on the detection of lesions in the proximal surfaces. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. pp93–147. Diss. The University of Utrecht Dental School. The Netherlands. (Alphen aan den Rijn/Brussel: Stafleu & Tholen, 1983), 1983.
4. Okano, T., Huang, H.-J. and Nakamura, T.: Diagnostic accuracy on detection of proximal enamel lesions in nonscreen radiographic performance.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 59: 543–7, 1985.
5. Svenson, B., Gröndahl, H.-G., Petersson, A. and Olving, A.: Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds.Swed Dent J. 9: 37–43, 1985.