Computers Aren’t Syntax All the Way Down or Content All the Way Up-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Computers Aren’t Syntax All the Way Down or Content All the Way Up

Published:2018-07-18 Issue:3 Volume:28 Page:543-567
ISSN:0924-6495
Container-title:Minds and Machines
language:en
Short-container-title:Minds & Machines

Author:

Bozşahin Cem^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-018-9469-2/fulltext.html

Reference56 articles.

1. Aaronson, S. (2005). Guest column: NP-complete problems and physical reality. ACM SIGACT News, 36(1), 30–52.

2. Aaronson, S. (2013). Why philosophers should care about computational complexity. In B. J. Copeland, C. J. Posy, & O. Shagrir (Eds.), Computability: Turing, Gödel, Church, and beyond. Cambridge: MIT Press.

3. Abend, O., Kwiatkowski, T., Smith, N., Goldwater, S., & Steedman, Mark. (2017). Bootstrapping language acquisition. Cognition, 164, 116–143.

4. ACM. (2012). ACM turing centenary celebration. Association for Computing Machinery, June 15–16, San Francisco. http://turing100.acm.org/ .

5. Bickhard, M. H. (1996). Troubles with computationalism. In W. O’Donohue & R. Kitchener (Eds.), Philosophy of psychology (pp. 173–183). London: Sage.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Computers as Interactive Machines: Can We Build an Explanatory Abstraction?;Minds and Machines;2023-03

2. The Mistakes of the Biological Naturalist Approach to the Artificial Mind;Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi;2022-09-30

3. Do Computers "Have Syntax, But No Semantics"?;Minds and Machines;2021-06

4. BICA for AGI;Cognitive Systems Research;2020-08

5. The Complexities of Syntax;The Philosophy and Science of Language;2020