A Teleological Approach to Information Systems Design
-
Published:2024-06-18
Issue:3
Volume:34
Page:
-
ISSN:1572-8641
-
Container-title:Minds and Machines
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Minds & Machines
Author:
Fumagalli Mattia,Ferrario Roberta,Guizzardi Giancarlo
Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, the design and production of information systems have seen significant growth. However, these information artefacts often exhibit characteristics that compromise their reliability. This issue appears to stem from the neglect or underestimation of certain crucial aspects in the application of Information Systems Design (ISD). For example, it is frequently difficult to prove when one of these products does not work properly or works incorrectly (falsifiability), their usage is often left to subjective experience and somewhat arbitrary choices (anecdotes), and their functions are often obscure for users as well as designers (explainability). In this paper, we propose an approach that can be used to support the analysis and re-(design) of information systems grounded on a well-known theory of information, namely, teleosemantics. This approach emphasizes the importance of grounding the design and validation process on dependencies between four core components: the producer (or designer), the produced (or used) information system, the consumer (or user), and the design (or use) purpose. We analyze the ambiguities and problems of considering these components separately. We then present some possible ways in which they can be combined through the teleological approach. Also, we debate guidelines to prevent ISD from failing to address critical issues. Finally, we discuss perspectives on applications over real existing information technologies and some implications for explainable AI and ISD.
Funder
Libera Università di Bolzano
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. 2. Akata, Z., Balliet, D., de Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Grossi, D., Hindriks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M., Oliehoek, F., Prakken, H., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L., van Harmelen, F., … Welling, M. (2020). A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: Augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence. Computer, 53(8), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.2996587 3. Anton, A. I. (1996). Goal-based requirements analysis. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on requirements engineering (pp. 136–144). IEEE. 4. Artiga, M. (2023). A dual-aspect theory of artifact function. Erkenntnis, 88(4), 1533–1554. 5. Artiga, M., & Martínez, M. (2016). The organizational account of function is an etiological account of function. Acta Biotheoretica, 64, 105–117.
|
|