“Oh, Dignity too?” Said the Robot: Human Dignity as the Basis for the Governance of Robotics

Author:

Zardiashvili LexoORCID,Fosch-Villaronga Eduard

Abstract

AbstractHealthcare robots enable practices that seemed far-fetched in the past. Robots might be the solution to bridge the loneliness that the elderly often experience; they may help wheelchair users walk again, or may help navigate the blind. European Institutions, however, acknowledge that human contact is an essential aspect of personal care and that the insertion of robots could dehumanize caring practices. Such instances of human–robot interactions raise the question to what extent the use and development of robots for healthcare applications can challenge the dignity of users. In this article, therefore, we explore how different robot applications in the healthcare domain support individuals in achieving ‘dignity’ or pressure it. We argue that since healthcare robot applications are novel, their associated risks and impacts may be unprecedented and unknown, thus triggering the need for a conceptual instrument that is binding and remains flexible at the same time. In this respect, as safety rules and data protection are often criticized to lack flexibility, and technology ethics to lack enforceability, we suggest human dignity as the overarching governance instrument for robotics, which is the inviolable value upon which all fundamental rights are grounded.

Funder

SCALES

LEaDing Fellows Marie Curie COFUND fellowship

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy

Reference86 articles.

1. Allsop, J. (2016). Values in law: How they influence and shape rules and the application of law. Lawasia J, p. 125.

2. Assembly, U. G. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. UN General Assembly, 302(2).

3. Athlin, E., Norberg, A., & Asplund, K. (1990). Caregivers’ perceptions and interpretations of severely demented patients during feeding in a task assignment system. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,4(4), 147–156.

4. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/587d/7897bf2629a4e6a0fba2c48b87a55166fa6e.pdf.

5. Bremhorst, A., Mongillo, P., Howell, T., & Marinelli, L. (2018). Spotlight on assistance dogs—legislation, welfare and research. Animals,8(8), 129.

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3