Abstract
AbstractCan autonomous systems replace humans in the performance of their activities? How does the answer to this question inform the design of autonomous systems? The study of technical systems and their features should be preceded by the study of the activities in which they play roles. Each activity can be described by its overall goals, governing norms and the intermediate steps which are taken to achieve the goals and to follow the norms. This paper uses the activity realist approach to conceptualize autonomous systems in the context of human activities. By doing so, it first argues for epistemic and logical conditions that illustrate the limitations of autonomous systems in tasks which they can and cannot perform, and then, it discusses the ramifications of the limitations of system autonomy on the design of autonomous systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy
Reference30 articles.
1. Aizawa, K. (2013). Introduction to “The material bases of cognition.” Minds & Machines, 23, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-013-9312-8
2. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
3. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
4. Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Should we treat teddy bear 2.0 as a Kantian dog? Four arguments for the indirect moral standing of personal social robots, with implications for thinking about animals and humans. Minds & Machines, 31, 337–360.
5. Danaher, J. (2016). Robots, law and the retribution gap. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 299–309.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献