Abstract
AbstractIn this article, I focus on the role of computer simulations as exploratory strategies. I begin by establishing the non-theory-driven nature of simulations. This refers to their ability to characterize phenomena without relying on a predefined conceptual framework that is provided by an implemented mathematical model. Drawing on Steinle’s notion of exploratory experimentation and Gelfert’s work on exploratory models, I present three exploratory strategies for computer simulations: (1) starting points and continuation of scientific inquiry, (2) varying the parameters, and (3) scientific prototyping.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy
Reference53 articles.
1. Ajelli, M., Gonçalves, B., et al. (2010). Comparing large-scale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: Agent-based versus structured metapopulation models. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10(190), 1–13.
2. Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2009). Scientific models in philosophy of science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
3. Balcan, D., Colizza, V., et al. (2009). Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(51), 21484–21489.
4. Beck, J., Canfield, B., et al. (1997). Three-dimensional imaging of trabecular bone using the computer numerically controlled milling technique. Bone, 21(3), 281–287.
5. Beisbart, C. (2014). Are We Sims? How computer simulations represent and what this means for the simulation argument. The Monist, 97(3), 399–417.