Encoding Ethics to Compute Value-Aligned Norms

Author:

Serramia MarcORCID,Rodriguez-Soto Manel,Lopez-Sanchez Maite,Rodriguez-Aguilar Juan A.,Bistaffa Filippo,Boddington Paula,Wooldridge Michael,Ansotegui Carlos

Abstract

AbstractNorms have been widely enacted in human and agent societies to regulate individuals’ actions. However, although legislators may have ethics in mind when establishing norms, moral values are only sometimes explicitly considered. This paper advances the state of the art by providing a method for selecting the norms to enact within a society that best aligns with the moral values of such a society. Our approach to aligning norms and values is grounded in the ethics literature. Specifically, from the literature’s study of the relations between norms, actions, and values, we formally define how actions and values relate through the so-called value judgment function and how norms and values relate through the so-called norm promotion function. We show that both functions provide the means to compute value alignment for a set of norms. Moreover, we detail how to cast our decision-making problem as an optimisation problem: finding the norms that maximise value alignment. We also show how to solve our problem using off-the-shelf optimisation tools. Finally, we illustrate our approach with a specific case study on the European Value Study.

Funder

H2020 Societal Challenges

H2020 LEIT Information and Communication Technologies

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad

H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies

Agència per a la Competitivitat de l’Empresa

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy

Reference94 articles.

1. Abbeel, P., & Ng, A. Y. (2004). Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on machine learning. ICML ’04 (p. 1.) New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015430.

2. Abel, D., MacGlashan, J., & Littman, M. L. (2016). Reinforcement learning as a framework for ethical decision making. In AAAI Workshop: AI, Ethics, and Society (vol. 16, p. 02). London: AAAI

3. Abel, D., MacGlashan, J., & Littman, M. L. (2016). Reinforcement learning as a framework for ethical decision making. In AAAI Workshop: AI, Ethics, and Society.

4. Ajmeri, N. (2018). Engineering multiagent systems for ethics and privacy-aware social computing. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University

5. Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3