Abstract
AbstractAs the use of AI systems continues to increase, so do concerns over their lack of fairness, legitimacy and accountability. Such harmful automated decision-making can be guarded against by ensuring AI systems are contestable by design: responsive to human intervention throughout the system lifecycle. Contestable AI by design is a small but growing field of research. However, most available knowledge requires a significant amount of translation to be applicable in practice. A proven way of conveying intermediate-level, generative design knowledge is in the form of frameworks. In this article we use qualitative-interpretative methods and visual mapping techniques to extract from the literature sociotechnical features and practices that contribute to contestable AI, and synthesize these into a design framework.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy
Reference86 articles.
1. Aler Tubella, A., Theodorou, A., Dignum, V., et al. (2020). Contestable black boxes. In V. Gutiérrez-Basulto, T. Kliegr, A. Soylu, et al. (Eds.), Rules and reasoning (Vol. 12173). Springer.
2. Almada, M. (2019). Human intervention in automated decision-making: Toward the construction of contestable systems. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2019, pp 2–11
3. Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media and Society, 20(3), 973–989.
4. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60(2), 168–175 http://www.jstor.org/stable/41961447.
5. Bayamlıoğlu, E. (2021). The right to contest automated decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation: Beyond the so-called “right to explanation”. Regulation and Governance.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献