What remains after the money ends? Evidence on whether admission reductions continued following the largest health and social care integration programme in England
-
Published:2024-03-09
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1618-7598
-
Container-title:The European Journal of Health Economics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Health Econ
Author:
Wattal VasudhaORCID, Checkland Katherine, Sutton Matt, Morciano Marcello
Abstract
AbstractWe study the long-term effects on hospital activity of a three-year national integration programme. We use administrative data spanning from 24 months before to 22 months after the programme, to estimate the effect of programme discontinuation using difference-in-differences method. Our results show that after programme discontinuation, emergency admissions were slower to increase in Vanguard compared to non-Vanguard sites. These effects were heterogeneous across sites, with greater reductions in care home Vanguard sites and concentrated among the older population. Care home Vanguards showed significant reductions beginning early in the programme but falling away more rapidly after programme discontinuation. Moreover, there were greater reductions for sites performing poorly before the programme. Overall, this suggests the effects of the integration programme might have been lagged but transitory, and more reliant on continued programme support.
Funder
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Jowell, R.: Trying it out: the role of ‘pilots’ in policy making: Report of a review of government pilots. Technical Report, Cabinet Office, Strategy Unit, United Kingdom (2003) 2. Checkland, K., Hammond, J., Coleman, A., Macinnes, J., Mikelyte, R., Croke, S., Billings, J., Bailey, S., Allen, P.: ‘Success’ in policy piloting: process, programmes and politics. Public Admin. 2021, 1 (2021) 3. Rocks, S., Berntson, D., Gil-Salmerón, A., Kadu, M., Ehrenberg, N., Stein, V., Tsiachristas, A.: Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Health Econ. 21(8), 1211–1221 (2020) 4. Tsiachristas, A., Stein, K.V., Evers, S., Rutten-van Mölken, M.: Performing economic evaluation of integrated care: Highway to hell or stairway to heaven? Int. J. Integr. Care 16(4), 3 (2016) 5. Quimbo, S., Wagner, N., Florentino, J., Solon, O., Peabody, J.: Do health reforms to improve quality have long-term effects? Results of a follow-up on a randomized policy experiment in the Philippines. Health Econ. 25(2), 165–177 (2016)
|
|